邓启龙1 朱 靖1 何承敏2 周 苗1 王 璐3 马光兴4 吴仕超5.晕针后踝泵与髋泵操作疗效差异[J].中国现代医生,2021,59(30):132-135 |
晕针后踝泵与髋泵操作疗效差异 |
Difference of operation efficacy between ankle pump and hip pump after acupuncture syncope |
|
DOI: |
中文关键词: 髋泵 踝泵 晕针 针刺 微针刀 |
英文关键词:Hip pump Ankle pump Acupuncture syncope Acupuncture Micro needle knife |
基金项目:国家自然科学基金委员会资助项目(81804185);浙江省“十三五”中医药重点专科建设项目(浙卫办中医〔2019〕1 号) |
|
摘要点击次数: 2510 |
全文下载次数: 8351 |
中文摘要: |
目的 探讨患者晕针后行踝泵与髋泵操作的效应差异。方法 回顾性分析2017 年9 月至2020 年6 月温州医科大学附属台州医院等5 家单位共44 例晕针患者临床资料,患者分为踝泵组(18 例)和髋泵组(26 例),比较两组患者临床特点、总缓解率、缓解效率及治疗依从性等情况。结果 两组患者晕针类型、晕针体位、年龄、性别比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05),两组处理晕针总缓解率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);但两组患者缓解效率和治疗依从性比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论 髋泵和踝泵均是缓解晕针不适的有效方法,但髋泵在缓解效率和治疗依从性上有比较优势,值得进一步研究和推广应用。 |
英文摘要: |
Objective To investigate the difference of efficacy between ankle pump and hip pump after acupuncture syncope.Methods The clinical data of 44 patients with acupuncture syncope admitted to 5 units including Taizhou Hospital Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University,etc.from September 2017 to June 2020 were retrospectively ana lyzed.The patients were divided into the ankle pump group (n=18) and the hip pump group (n=26).The clinical features,total response rate,remission rate and treatment compliance of the two groups of patients were compared.Results There were no statistically significant differences in all the types and positions of acupuncture syncope,ages and genders of the patients in the two groups (P>0.05).There was no statistically significant difference in the total response rate of treating acupuncture syncope between the two groups (P>0.05).However,there were statistically significant differences in remission efficiency and treatment compliance between the two groups of patients (P<0.01).Conclusion Both hip pump and ankle pump are effective methods to relieve discomfort caused by acupuncture syncope,but hip pump has comparative advantages in relieving efficiency and treatment compliance,which is worthy of further research and promotion and application. |
查看全文 查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
关闭 |