赵同香1 王海英2▲.基于CiteSpace的疾病诊断相关分组研究热点分析[J].中国现代医生,2021,59(19):1-6+封三 |
基于CiteSpace的疾病诊断相关分组研究热点分析 |
Analysis of research hot spots of diagnosis related group system based on CiteSpace |
|
DOI: |
中文关键词: DRGs 疾病诊断相关分组 Citespace 数据可视化 |
英文关键词:DRGs Diagnosis related group system Citespace Data visualization |
基金项目: |
|
摘要点击次数: 2766 |
全文下载次数: 4535 |
中文摘要: |
目的 对DRGs 研究的文献数据进行分析,确定国内外DRGs 研究的热点与发展前沿。方法 以CNKI 数据库和Web of Science 数据库为数据来源,采用Citespace 软件分析文献数量、合作网络以及关键词共现等内容。结果 美国、德国的DRGs 研究在国际上存在一定的影响力,我国DRGs 研究整体呈波动增长,但国际影响力有待提高;国内作者与研究机构合作网络较国际分散,跨区合作较少;国外研究热点聚焦于DRGs 支付特征、热点问题,着眼解决前期DRGs 未覆盖的疾病研究领域,国内以支付方式改革、数据质量、绩效评价为热点。结论 我国DRGs 系统已在借鉴其他国家经验基础上本土化,DRGs 付费制已在全国推广,需要各方共同参与,协调资源,才能使其适用于临床、服务于医院。 |
英文摘要: |
Objective To analyze the literature data of DRGS research and determine the hot spots and development frontiers of DRGs research at home and abroad.Methods CNKI database and Web of Science database were used as data sources,and CiteSpace software was used to analyze the literature quantity,cooperative network and keyword cooccurrence of the research data.Results The DRGs research in the United States and Germany has a certain worldwide influence.The overall DRGs research in China fluctuated,but its international influence needed to be improved.The cooperation network of domestic authors and research institutions was more scattered than that of international ones,and there was less cross-regional cooperation.Overseas research focused on the payment characteristics and hot issues of DRGs,focusing on the disease research areas not covered by DRGs in the past,while domestic research focused on the reform of payment methods,data quality and performance evaluation.Conclusion China's DRGs system has been localized on the basis of drawing lessons from the experience of other countries,and the DRGs payment system has been promoted nationwide,which requires the joint participation of all parties and coordination of resources to make it applicable to clinical practice and serve hospitals. |
查看全文 查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
关闭 |